KEF LS50 Meta Bookshelf Speakers (Pair)

These speakers get really great reviews here and by audio magazine journalists, but I’m not sure why. As another reviewer here stated, these are good, but not great speakers. They definitely don’t live up to the hype. Very questionable if they are worth the now $1600 price (up from $1500 when I purchased). Here’s the good and not so good- Good: 1.) The KEF LS-50 speakers are really solid and well built. The design may not be for everyone, but they do look kinda cool. 2.) The speakers have a very full, wide, smooth natural soundstage. Plump and juicy might be a good way to describe it. They put out a sound that belies their small size, provided they are set up per the manufacturer’s instructions. (8-12 ft apart and 18” from wall), and fed enough power. 60 WPC is absolute bare minimum and then only in a small room. I’d recommend 150-200, and find an amp that has a musical sound. Amps that have a sterile, dry, and precise sound will not pair well with these speakers. Spend some $$ on a good amp and your ears will be rewarded. I have a Schiit Rag2, and while it sounds good with the speakers, 60WPC is not enough power. 3.) Really good bass for speakers their size. Will suffice for many listeners, but you’ll want a subwoofer if you like to rattle the walls. So what’s not to like? 1.) The sound from the LS-50 meta lacks depth and detail (it’s very ‘flat’) and therefore they have *very* poor imaging- from the perspective of being able to identify the location of instruments in the soundstage. The positioning of instrument in the soundstage is not well defined, and is very vague and indistinct. The sound from instruments seems to emanate from everywhere because of the lack of detail. Really poor for speakers at this price level. This is the major issue with these speakers. 2.) These pups will take 100 hours of listening to fully run-in. Don’t invite your audiophile friends over to listen to your new speakers the week you get them--you will be embarrassed. They are very closed and very tight and “boxey” at first and don’t begin to open up until 40 hours and then really don’t sound reasonably good until you get past 80. You *will* have buyer’s remorse at first, but give them a chance and they will get better. Play them while you’re at work or not at home if you can, to speed up the run-in. There are posts on the web on how to do this without pissing off your neighbors. Final thoughts: I’d recommend these speakers for those people who grew up listening to digital music recorded from the mid-00’s to date. Starting around that time music was compressed and brickwalled in the studio during post-production which had the effect of removing all dynamics and detail from the music. Here’s a description of brickwalling from Steve Hoffman forums- “I call something brickwalled when there are no dynamics left in the music. Everything is so limited and compressed that all passages of the music are the same volume. Songs mastered this way are perceived to be LOUD LOUD LOUD!” So you won’t miss the detail and dynamics because it never existed in the recorded music to begin with. I would *not* recommend these speakers to those who are listening with vinyl or high quality digital sources of music (DSF or HD Flac) recorded before mid-00’s. You will definitely miss the lack of detail, dynamics and imaging in the soundstage, especially if you are listening to acoustic, vocals, or classical music. My test system consists of- • Emotiva XPA-5 Gen 2, 200 watts per channel class AB amplifier and Schiit Rag2, 60 WPC • Oppo BDP-205 Blu-ray and streaming music player • I used really well recorded DSD128 files for auditioning • High quality speaker cables, and Mogami Gold studio quality balanced audio cables between the analog audio output of the Oppo and the XPA-5 inputs I also compared the LS-50 Meta’s to the Dahlquist DQ-10s. The DQ-10’s are 80’s era speakers with a cult following and are some of the best sounding and imaging speakers out there today. While I didn’t expect the LS-50’s to match the DQ-10’s they fell far short of my expectations.