Back to Amazon.com
customer reviews
3,745
4.6 out of 5 stars

Audio Technica Fully Auto Belt Driven Turntable

$87.99
$139.95 37% off Reference Price
Condition: New
Sold out Back to product details

Top positive review
683 people found this helpful
A detailed comparison vs. the AT-LP120
By Jeremy on Reviewed in the United States on December 26, 2015
The only thing that could be better is a vintage one in good shape. The problem with vintage is that how does one *really* know it is in good shape without taking it home? The best you can hope for is to discern that it actually works. If you don't have the time or money to gamble on vintage gear, go for this one. I have 3 other turntables, against which to compare it: 1) Audio-Technica AT-LP120-USB. (from here on, I will refer to this as the '120' and the AT-LP60 as the '60) This is a great turntable. It looks better, feels better, but I can't say that I can tell the difference in sound it produces. Some of the things we pay extra for on that model are: a) Quartz timing control. This is something of value. b) 78 RPM speed, if you want the option of being able to play back the pre-1950 records. This is something of value. c) Manual pitch adjustment. I'm told some bad recordings had the speed off, so this is a way to manually correct it. I've got a couple hundred records, and have not yet found one that had the speed obviously off, so I can't see any value in this. d) Reverse direction. I can't see any value in this either. Some records have hidden messages if you play them backwards. Seems like something that might give a little thrill to hear it once or twice, but to pay extra for this ability? Nah, just go listen to those albums on YouTube to get your thrill. e) Electronic controls. These will probably hold up better many years down the road than the mechanical controls of the 60. No moving parts = fewer failure points. f) Counterbalanced tonearm. In theory, this is better, as we can adjust the stylus to ride heavily enough in the grooves to provide good sound, but not so heavy as to cause undue wear to the records. I've read elsewhere where someone measured the weight at the stylus and found this one to be 3 g. When I got the weight adjusted properly on my 120, it was 2.5 g. Not a notable difference, in the end. g) S-shaped tonearm. They say this is better, but I'll be darned if I can hear the difference. h) Interchangeable headshell and cartridge. They say a change of cartridge makes a big difference in sound. Some people will spend hundreds of dollars on high-end cartridges to tailor the sound just to their liking. That seems silly to me. Why not just adjust the tone controls on one's amplifier? Or get a proper EQ component. Anyway, I can admit there could be some value in this. i) USB out option. The 60 is available with this too, for an extra $20. It works great with the free Audacity software. I've ripped several LPs to .wav and .mp3. It's worth paying extra for this feature, if only to make the records portable. But you don't need to upgrade to the 120 to get it. j) Much heavier. The 120 has a big steel plate inside. I'm not sure what is up with this obsession for vibration dampening. There's no discernable difference in sound as a result of all this damping. Any difference heard would be mostly down to the cartridge. k) LED strobe, to confirm at a glance that the RPM is correct. More comparison between the 60 and 120 later. 2) Ion Vinyl Transport turntable. This uses the same mechanism as the ever-popular Crosley Cruiser, but adds battery operation, which I love. With the battery operation option, it is totally portable, not just portable in theory. I bring this to me to the Goodwill and other places for listening to used records. Gotta find out if those scratches are "skippers" before paying the full $1 and taking up room in my apartment for more junk. I bought this for sixty bucks at a local Half Price Books store, which also sells records. I just love this turntable, but it is not at all in the same league as this AT-LP60. It has a ceramic cartridge instead of magnetic. Sound quality is pretty terrible in this class of turntable. If you're listening to a Crosley with this mechanism, you're really missing out on how good vinyl can actually sound. 3) Fisher-Price from 1978. I just gave this to my daughter for Christmas. Check feeBay, you'll see the one. Believe it or not, this has a much better speaker than the Crosley/Ion/Jenson ones, and hence, better sound quality. But of course not comparable to this one, since it still has a ceramic cartridge. For techno-geeks, it has a really interesting drive mechanism though! (check YouTube for 'how to repair a fisher-price turntable) Now if you're looking at this turntable and you're on a budget, you're likely also looking at the 120 model, for over double the price. Having both of them now, I think this 60 is a much value. For the money, it gives just what one is after: 1) Affordable 2) HiFi-grade sound 3) Not too big or heavy 4) Semi-automatic operation. This is the key difference. It makes it very nearly as convenient to play a record as a CD, yet we still have the option to do it manually. The 60is about 40% smaller and 70% lighter than the 120, yet it functions just as well. It doesn't take up as much room, and it isn't a back-breaker to occasionally move around. The one con I've found so far about this turntable is that it comes with a felt slip mat. (same as on the 120) These are a disaster when it comes to static. I opened my 60 yesterday for Christmas, then re-packed it to bring home. I wasn't careful enough in repacking, and I crunched up the edge of the slip mat, so now the records don't spin flat. I pressed it underneath something heavy and flat last night, but it is still jacked up. I've got a couple cork ones inbound to replace these. That will address the static problem, as well as the crunched up problem. In short, the 120 is probably a much heavier-duty turntable. It will run hour after hour, year after year and keep going. No belts to break, no mechanics to break, nothing to really go wrong, except maybe electronic. But considering it is basically a copy of the famous DJ-favored Technics 1200, which was a mature design to begin with, that's probably not even a concern. The 60 is a lighter-duty unit. It MIGHT wear out after 10 years of constant, heavy use. But its a lot more affordable, a lot more convenient, and a lot lighter and smaller. (though it can still operate fully with the dust cover down)
Top critical review
Skips on re-presses; sound is now slowing down and warping.
By Mitchey on Reviewed in the United States on December 18, 2017
This was a huge disappointment, as it skipped 3 BRAND NEW records I had bought (Ziggy Stardust, Jimmy Hendrix, Deep Purple). I certainly understand that these were represses of original records (and to be fair, it never skipped on a newly released album), but believe that it should play all records. When I played these records on "older" record players, they didn't skip. I should add that this record player did not have any problem playing old records. I am really bummed out about this. What is more, now that I've been using it for a while, the pitch starts to drag the longer a record plays and consequently sounds horrible. What do I expect for a 100 dollar record player? More than this, that's for sure. [edit 1, a week or so after the above: Here’s the long version. Way more than you need, but I feel the story must get told so that the public knows. It’s my civic duty.] BUT FIRST, without reading my entire story of heartbreak with this thing, the most important addendum I absolutely must make to the above is that AMAZON WAS AWESOME. They broke their return policy for me and let me send it back 5 months after I bought it. Here’s the whole story: I saw the 4.3 (or whatever it was at the time) average rating of this record player on Amazon and thought it would be good for an entry-level person like me. I wanted to see what the vinyl-hype was all about and have very fond memories of my parents always having a record on. Here’s the thing though: I didn't look at the distribution of the reviews and definitely didn't read any of the one-star reviews. I just bought it, assuming it would all balance out and be pretty ok, for 100 bucks. Wrong. The product is crappy. I was pretty excited about this when I got it. Picked up some 99 cent vintage records here and there and was impressed with the sound quality and ease of use for 100 bucks. Shortly after I bought the record player, I ordered a re-press of an album I’ve been loving a lot lately: Ziggy Stardust. I took the plastic off and carefully put it on the spindle. Sounded great! I flipped it over to side two and was utterly dismayed that it skipped on the first 3 songs. I returned the record (ebay) and chalked it up a faulty “new” record. I kept picking up used older vinyl here and there and never had any problems with any of those records. The next important thing that happened in the saga is when I splurged on Machine Head (a repress) from Laurie’s Planet of Sound in Lincoln Square, Chicago (which, by the way, is a great record store. Check it out if you’re in town!). I excitedly took off the plastic and listened through side one. It sounded pretty damn good. BUT, on side 2, it skipped right at the beginning of Smoke on the Water. Granted, I am sick to death of that song so might not always want to listen to it. But I paid to have the option to, right? Bad record again? Hmmm... I took the record into Laurie’s Planet of Sound and had them put it on their record player (a vintage one with a weighted arm, etc). They were kind enough to let me return if it skipped on theirs. The place where it skipped had a loud pop, but did not skip. I started the return of the record player (this was within the first 30 days of my owning it). I can’t explain why exactly, but I just never got around to returning it. Of course the main thing was the hassle of doing the return. Another thing was that a small part of me still thought maybe these were 2 bad records. So I just kept on using it. I consulted with the people at Laurie’s and other record stores to see if anyone else was complaining about these newly re-pressed classic albums skipping on new record players. I couldn't get much traction on that. I tried to find info to read online about it and even tried the stupid nickel thing (probably not the best idea, but...Hey! I'm a newb!). Needless to say, that didn't work either. A month or so later, I bought 2 Jimi Hendrix records at Best Buy. Axis: Bold as Love was great all the way through (and again, sounded quite nice), but Are You Experienced had skips in the first 3 songs of side 2. I failed to return this record to Best Buy in time. This was getting out of hand. Is this whole industry of re-pressed classic records just shoddy? If so, how come no one else is really talking about it or complaining about it? Maybe I was looking in the wrong place, but I couldn't find any forums where this was being discussed. By the way, Best Buy was actually displaying this very same record player model RIGHT UNDER the records I bought. So you're selling a record player that doesn’t play the records you sell? Grrrrrrrrrr! New record players should be able to play all records. Period. I should note that it only did this with new re-presses of original old records; when I played a new recent album (D'Angelo - Black Messiah), it didn't skip. That's the only data I have for new albums. The last in this series of unfortunate events with this record player is that it began to drag records as they played. The sound started to warp worse and worse as the minutes passed. It was unlistenable, and the last stupid-annoying straw for me. Normally I would admit that the nickel thing I stupidly did might have exacerbated this, but many other one-star reviewers had speed problems as well and I can't imagine all of them taped nickels to the needle-arm too. I am a nice person and hate to complain to strangers unwarranted. I also try to follow the rules, but at this point, when I saw the return I had started at Amazon months earlier, I went ahead and tried to complete it. Understandably, Amazon would not let me complete the return as I was well past the 30-day return window. I emailed them to ask if they would make an exception for me, explaining my complaints. They emailed me back within hours and said that they couldn’t but that I should check with AT directly. Which, again, I get. They shouldn’t break the rules because I couldn't admit to myself that this product sucks. Well, right after I got the rejection on the return, I wrote my original review (above). A few hours after that, the return label was mysteriously in my email in-box. THANK YOU, Amazon. This is probably the best customer service I’ve ever received. I don’t know what data caused you to reconsider (not sure if it was the review [and that definitely was not my motive for writing it]), but I am so happy about them taking my return. It’s not even the money, really. It’s just a shitty product and AT should issue a factory recall. Best Buy should NOT have it on their shelves. If it was Amazon's clerical error, that’s fine too, but I prefer to give Amazon the point on this one, as these “mistakes” never happen in the customer’s favor. For the people who gave it 5 stars and never had any problems with it, you are lucky. If you are considering this product, you might get one that works, or you might get a crappy one. It’s a huge gamble. If you want to only listen to used records, it might work for a while. But then it might start to slow down, like mine did. It might have a different issue other 1-star raters mentioned. Save yourself time and (in my case, many) headache(s) and learn from us: DON'T DO IT! Of extreme interest to me (and should be to you) is this review by Mourtal, who initially gave it a 5-star review but went through a similarly stupid-annoying nightmare with it and AT and changed his 5-star review to a 1-star (you must copy and paste link; it won't let me hyperlink): https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/R23NRXC2OH5NWH/ref=cm_cr_getr_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B002GYTPAE I read through all of the 1-star reviews for this product to date (yes, all 37 pages) and have learned a very important life-lesson: always read 1-star reviews when buying a costlier product. It’s not about average reviews; it’s more like Russian roulette. You might get a bad one. Which is definitely a first-world problem, but doesn't change the fact that it still sucks. I just ordered the House of Marley, Stir It Up Turntable - 45/33 RPM, USB jack in back for analog to PC recording, Replaceable Cartridge, Bamboo Plinth, EM-JT000-SB Signature Black based solely on the fact that it has ONLY 4 and 5 star reviews. We'll see how it goes. I was going to get a Pioneer PL-30-K Audiophile Stereo Turntable with Dual-Layered Chassis and Built-in Phono Equalizer based on some of the other AT-LP60 1-star reviewers' recommendations, but it had similarly weird 1-star reviews. I just want a record player that sounds decent and that I don’t have to worry about. By the way, last I was in, I noticed that Laurie’s Planet of Sound is now using the AT-LP60 in-house. I bet that won’t last long.

Sort by:
Filter by:
By -
Verified Amazon Purchase
Vine Customer Review of Free Product
Sorry, no reviews match your current selections.
Try clearing or changing some filters.Show all reviews
Show more reviews


people found this helpful
By -
Verified Amazon Purchase
Vine Customer Review of Free Product